Wisdom from The Action Wisdom In Action

preached to the public several times that "half-bird creature fossils and a half-dinosaur has been discovered." Evolutionist media put pictures of the creature called "bird dinosaur" This and a campaign was waged throughout the world. But, soon learned that this campaign is based on contradictions and forgeries.

The first figure in this campaign is Sinosauropteryx, a dinosaur found in China in 1996. The fossil was introduced to the world as the "feathered dinosaur bird", and displayed as news headlines. However, the review detailed in the following months revealed that the structure touted by evolutionists as the "feather" is actually not a bird feather.
This is the presentation of the news in an article titled plucking the Feathered Dinosaur in the journal Science:

Exactly one year ago, the paleontologists busy thrash photographs called "feathered dinosaur bird", which circulated in the Vertebrate Paleontology annual meeting of the Association. Sinosauropteryx specimen from the Yixian Formation in China occupy the front page of The New York Times, and is considered by some as evidence that the dinosaur is the origin of birds. But at this year's vertebrate paleontology meeting in Chicago last month, the conclusion somewhat different: it is not the structure of modern bird feathers, said about a dozen Western paleontologists who have seen the specimens that ... paleontologist Larry Martin of the University of Kansas, Lawrence, argued that such structures is a loose loose collagen fibers under the skin - so, no relation at all with fowl .

One more hustle and bustle of "dino-bird" blaring in the year 1999. One more fossil found in China is shown as a "major proof of evolution". National Geographic magazine, the source of this campaign, has been making and distributing images imaginary "feathered dinosaur bird" based on fictitious fossils. In some countries, the picture became headline news. Species that are alive 125 million years ago, immediately given the scientific name Archaeoraptor liaoningensis.

However, the fossil was a fake and expertly prepared in a separate specimens from five fruits. A year later, a group of researchers, three of which paleontologists, proved the forgery with the help of X-ray computer tomography. Dino-bird evolution was the result of Chinese engineering. Some domestic Chinese amateur bird-dino was formed from 88 pieces of bone and stone with the help of glue and cement. Research has shown, this Archaeoraptor formed using the front frame of an ancient bird, and the body and tail bone is formed from four different specimens. Articles in the scientific journal Nature describes it as follows counterfeiting:

Archaeoraptor fossil was announced as the "missing link" and regarded as the strongest evidence possible, after Archaeopteryx, which proves that birds are the result of the evolution of several types of meat-eating dinosaurs. However, Archaeoraptor exposed as a forgery, which form the combined number of bone from a primitive bird and a dinosaur that can not fly dromaeosaurid ... Archaeoraptor specimens, which are reported as a result of a collection of Early Kretasea Jiufotang Formation in Liaoning, was smuggled from China and then sold the land in the United States in the commercial market ... We conclude that Archaeoraptor consists of two or more species, and contains at least two, maybe five, different specimens ...

So, how can the National Geographic can present a major scientific fraud to the world as the "primary evidence the truth of evolution"? The answer is shrouded in an evolutionary illusion among the magazine's editorial staff. National Geographic blindly support Darwinism, and do not hesitate to use whatever means it deems propaganda support that theory. Finally, the magazine is stuck in the "Piltdown man scandal" second.
Evolutionist scientists are also aware of his fanatical National Geographic. Dr. Storrs L. Olson, head of the Department of Ornithology at the prestigious Smithsonian Institute, announced that he had previously warned that the fossil was a fake. However, magazine executives were not ignored. In his letter to Peter Raven of National Geographic, Olson writes:

Before the publication of the article "Getting a dinosaur wing" in the edition of National Geographic magazine in July 1998, Lou Mazzatenta, the photographer for Sloan's article, invited me to the National Geographic Society to look at pictures of Chinese fossils and to comment on the story. At that time, I try to emphasize the fact that strongly supports a number of alternative viewpoints that exist other than those presented to National Geographic. However, had finally become clear in front of me that National Geographic was not interested in anything other than the existing dogma, that birds are the result of evolution dinosaurs .

In a statement in USA Today, Olson said, "The problem is, when the fossils have been known by National Geographic as a fake, but the information is not disclosed. '44 In other words, he said that the National Geographic counterfeiting maintain that, despite knowing that the fossil which was preached by him as evidence for evolution is false.
Should be explained here, that the actions of the National Geographic is not the first forgery in order to maintain the theory of evolution. Many similar incidents after the theory was first proposed. German biologist, Ernst Haeckel, create a false image of the embryo to support Darwin. British evolutionists put an orangutan jaw on the skull of a human head, and over 40 years exhibited at the British Museum as "Piltdown man, the greatest proof of the truth of evolution." Evolutionists American show "Nebraska man" from a pig tooth. Around the world, a false image of so-called "reconstruction", which actually never existed, has been regarded as "primitive" or "ape-man."
In short, the evolutionists have been repeated cases of human Piltdown forgery methods. They created their own form of transition that they could not find. In history, this event shows how much has been deceiving the international propaganda for the theory of evolution, and evolutionists are willing to do all sorts of lies to defend it.

Harun Yahya