Wisdom from The Action Wisdom In Action

the "ancestors" they were in ancient times. According to this theory, the human embryo in the womb of the mother was initially displays the physical characteristics of a fish, and reptiles, and the last man. This opinion sparked a statement that embryos have "gill" in its growth stage.

However, this is all just a superstition. Scientific developments that have been achieved, since the recapitulation buzzed for the first time, has enabled the truth test statement. These researches have been done show that the doctrine of recapitulation does not have any basis other than fantasies and mistaken interpretation of deliberate evolutionists.
What is now known that the so-called "gill", which grew in the early stages of human embryonic development, is actually the initial phase of the middle ear canal, the thymus and parathyroid glands. Sections of embryos that likened the "yolk sac" apparently is the sac that functions to produce the baby's blood. Part of so-called "tail" by Haeckel and his followers, is actually a spine that looks like a tail because it formed earlier than the legs.
These are facts that are widely recognized in the scientific world, and even the evolutionists themselves admit it. George Gaylord Simpson, one of the founders of neo-Darwinism, writes:

Haeckel's false claim that evolutionary principles are used. Now with a solid has been confirmed that ontogeny does not repeat phylogeny.
The following are listed in an article in New Scientist dated October 16, 1999:

[Haeckel] called this as biogenetika law, and this idea was later widely referred to as recapitulation. In fact, Haeckel's strict law was soon proved wrong. For example, early stage human embryo never has functioning gills like a fish, and never pass through stages that resemble an ape or reptile adult.
In an article published in American Scientist, we read:
Indeed, the law biogenetika was really dead. This law is finally removed from biology textbooks in the fifties. As a subject of serious theoretical study, this law is already extinct in the twenties ...

As we have seen, since it first appeared, the various developments taking place shows that the recapitulation of absolutely no scientific basis. However, these same developments indicate that the recapitulation is not merely a scientific fraud, but rather a "forgery" pure.

By. Harun Yahya